THIS IS NOT AN OFFICIAL HIGH COURT WEBSITE
IT IS THE WEBSITE OF A LITIGANT IN PERSON
IT IS INTENDED TO BE A SCRUTINY OF AEJIS LEGAL

LIES more LIES & FABRICATED EVIDENCE & FRAUD:

Fabricating Evidence > section 126 CRIMINAL CODE QLD
Attempting to Pervert Justice > section 140 CRIMINAL CODE QLD.
Pleadings are formal court documents that serve to give notice of the nature of the claim and defence being litigated.
Summary Judgment is a mechanism for deciding cases where it can be clearly demonstrated that a trial is unnecessary.
Application for Summary Judgement was based on the Defence pleadings not disclosing a reasonable defence.
And that it was reasonable to assume, that SCOTT ARGLES did not want to amend those pleadings by ignoring an invitation to do so.
Summary Judgment will not be achieved if there are issues of fact or law to investigate, in such a case, the matter should go to trial.
The substantial avoidance in the Defence pleadings created multiple deemed admissions, thereby not disclosing any issues of fact or law.
So without a mandate from the Court to withdraw the deemed admissions pursuant to Rule 188, ARGLES introduced his LIES.
FABRICATED EVIDENCE is not an issue for trial, and attempting to portray it as an issue, is ATTEMPTED FRAUD on the COURT.

GO TO FABRICATED EVIDENCE

GOOGLE SEARCH